1989 : Two words – Mandal Commission – set a whole generation on fire. And quite literally, with a young man in flames as the picture of the outrage that prevailed then.
2006 : Seventeen years later, the spectre seems to haunt again. This time no life has been sacrificed till now. But, the voices are loud enough.
Reservation – the phenomenon that links these seventeen years, seems to have become more than a blip on the political radar-screen of the country. A few months from now, the nation enters into its sixtieth year of independence. So, is it not appropriate that the mindset of our policymakers seems to be sixty years (or even more) old as well? This is the most important point to be noted in this context. The constitutional amendment of December 2005 was just a reworking of the original Mandal Commission recommendations – some of the points left untouched seventeen years ago are being given a new make-up now. So, the can of worms is only being reopened, albeit slightly differently. This is not a new package that is creating all the uproar.
Almost sixty years after independence and we are still on the path to being a “developed country”. Why are we still a “developing country”? Because we have failed to uplift the SCs,STs and OBCs? Or, we never had any proper social justice system in the first place? Probably both. Probably neither. In other words, even if we had a plan in mind, we chose to stay idle and allowed it to become an ugly instrument of favour-mongering. So, the backward did not move an inch forward. Today, our policymakers are attempting to do it all over again and turn the clock back by aeons. Whoever thought of changed circumstances!
A friend of mine from Hyderabad has very sarcastically suggested that there should be reservation in sports as well. In our cricket team, a minimum number of positions have to be reserved for SC/ST/OBC players. Accordingly, Shoaib Akhtar should bowl slower deliveries to these batsmen and so on. I do not hesitate to extend his sarcasm – reserve these players’ endorsement contracts as well. A fixed amount from endorsements is a must fro them. In a scenario where the quality:quantity ratio is already horribly skewed (lakhs of students compete for a few dozen seats), nothing but a disaster beckons. Instead of providing scholarships or increasing seats, reservation is the choice – populism at best, irrational at worst. Is this what it takes………..to be little bit wise?



